BBC News

2008年5月8日 星期四

Leprosy-A Disease Going to Be Eliminated?

Abstract

           Leprosy is one of the oldest diseases in the world. It is also one of the infectious diseases that the WHO actively works to eliminate. Currently, leprosy cases are decreasing at an average rate of 20% per year. Most common clinical manifestations of leprosy, resulting in organ dysfunction and influencing patients’ daily life, are skin, mucosa, and nervous system lesion. For eliminating leprosy, the best policies are finding cases, treating them, making leprosy diagnosis and treatment available, launching the international cooperation, designing national decentralized campaigns, and decreasing the disability and stigma. With continuing efforts and collaborative activities, leprosy will soon be eliminated.

Introduction

Leprosy, also called Hansen's disease, is one of the most important neglected tropical infectious diseases in the world. For a long time, leprosy has been regarded as a disease related to poverty and poor public health. Most of the leprosy cases now are in countries with relative low income and poor public health conditions. According to the WHO’s report, the estimated cases in 2007 was 224,717; cases are decreasing at an average rate of about 20% per year. The main strategy to control leprosy now is disease elimination, and it has achieved great successes; however, there are a lot of challenges.

Leprosy, caused by the bacteria, Mycobacterium leproae, is a chronic infectious disease with long incubation period to develop the disease. Like other famous mycobacterium species, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, host immunity plays an important role in the disease progress and clinical presentations. The role of cellular immunity decides the severity of clinical manifestation.

image

Most common clinical manifestations of leprosy, resulting in organ dysfunction and influencing patients’ daily life, are skin, mucosa, and nervous system lesions. Before the cause and transmission of the disease were well understood, patients with Hansen's disease were isolated and abandoned from the society. In Taiwan, leprosy, regarded as a shameful disease, was eliminated for more than 50 years. Patients with leprosy were forced to be isolated from the society and lived in a special community. These people were despised, and their human rights were abolished at that time. Though the disease is not regarded as a stigma anymore, these patients freely came back to the society. People are still afraid that leprosy people will hurt them. For memorizing this dark history, the Taiwanese try to preserve their community as a memorial museum to teach about the newer generation the disease and how a wrong attitude influence these peoples’ lives.

Different host cellular immunity levels have different clinical manifestations. According to the activity of T cells, clinical manifestations in leprosy are divided into five (5-category Ridley-Jopling system): tuberculoid (TT), lepromatous (LL), borderline tuberculoid (BT), midborderline (BB), and borderline lepromatous (BL). The weaker the cellular response to Mycobacterium leprosy is, the more possible the disease presents as the lepromatous type. The stronger the cellular response to Mycobacterium leprosy is, the more possible the disease presents as the tuberculoid type. Borderline types are between them. Another classification for leprosy is based on the amount of bacteria: paucibacillary and multibacillary. The definition is easy to apply; therefore, it is popular in a lot of places.

image

Schematic representation of the clinical and immunological spectrum of leprosy. CMI, cell-mediated immunity; ENL, erythema nodosum leprosum; TT, tuberculoid leprosy; BT, borderline tuberculoid leprosy; BB, mid-borderline leprosy; BL, borderline lepromatous leprosy; LL, lepromatous leprosy.

 

image

image

image

left: tuberculoid leprosy middle:borderline tuberculoid leprosy right:lepromatous leprosy

Clinical Manifestations

The most vulnerable tissues or organs for leprosy are skin, mucosa and peripheral nerves. Leprosy is commonly presented as skin lesions, numbness and loss of sensation. Because the peripheral nerves are involved, patients who lost the sensation are unaware of skin damage, resulting in ulceration and muscle dystrophy and dysfunction.

image
Skin lesions

Early skin lesions start from hypopigmented skin colors. Initially, histocytes are infiltrated into the lesion, and then chronic inflammation progresses and results in granuloma changes. Different host immune responses have different skin presentations.

Tuberculoid type skin lesions usually have few lesions. Well-defined macular or papular lesions with hypopigmented color changes are the main characteristic of the disease. Tuberculoid type skin lesions usually have granulomas surrounding neurovascular elements but with few acid-fast positive bacilli.

Lepromatous type usually presents with nodular lesions. If skin lesions are untreated, the lesions thicken and present as “leonine facies”. Not like the tuberculoid type skin lesions, a lot of acid-fast positive bacilli are noted under microscope.

Nerve lesions

Mycobacterium leprosy affects sensory, motor, and autonomic function of peripheral nerves. Sensory loss is the earliest stage; with the disease progress, more nerves are involved. The most commonly involved nerves are posterior tibital nerve, ulnar, median, lateral politeal, and facial nerves. The nerve damage varies from reduced sensation, loss of sweating, a glove and stocking hypohidrosis to complete nerve loss. Nerves are damaged and dysfunction because of the granulomatous infiltrations. Patients with damaged sensory nerves are vulnerable to the trauma and secondary infections. Like diabetes patients, these people are not aware of dangers around them. However, motor and autonomic nerve damage leads to muscle dystrophy and organ dysfunction, which have great impacts on patients’ daily lives.

Ocular lesions

Blindness is one of the most severe consequences of leprosy. Bacteria either directly infiltrate into the ocular structures or damage the nerve by causing chronic inflammation; with the disease progress, blindness caused by leprosy results in huge disabilities and social economic impacts.

Diagnosis and Treatment

The diagnosis of leprosy needs both clinical suspensions and laboratory diagnosis. Treatments of leprosy need multiple drug therapy (MDT). In WHO regimens, for paucibacillary lesions: Rifampicin 600 mg or Dapsone 100 mg. These treatments need six month treatment course. For multibacillary, Rifampicin 600 mg + clofazimine 300 mg or Clofazimine 50 mg + dapsone 100 mg. These treatments need at least 12 months. Some severe cases need to extend to 24 months. Because the treatments are long, drug adherence and resistance are important issues.

Global Impacts

After a series of hard works, leprosy cases are decreasing. However, no matter cases with active leprosy or cases receiving treatment, disabilities resulted from leprosy have great social-economic impacts.

Leprosy epidemic countries usually are poor countries. These countries do not have good public health prospects for disease detection, prevention, management and rehabilitation. Infected cases are frequently not able to receive the most optimal treatment. Cases with lifelong effects of nerve damage and consequent disabilities are impossible to get rehabilitation and welfare support in these poor countries. Disabled cases and their families need to face stigmas, community rejection, loss of employment, which increase the economic burden of the society and trigger another vicious cycles.

Leprosy has great economic impacts. In the statistics of Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), the Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) of leprosy are 199 thousands (Male vs Female: 117 vs. 82). However, the cost of the disease elimination and prevention proves to be cost-effective. Global leprosy eliminating programs successfully decrease the active cases in a lot of leprosy endemic countries.

 

Discussion

Treatment Projects

The most effective method for leprosy is treatment. A multidrug therapy (MDT) based on the combination of the antibiotics dapsone, rifampicin, and clofazimine was introduced in 1982 after dapsone-resistant strains appeared and spread. MDT proved highly efficacious in killing the bacteria. Some massive international efforts were launched to eradicate leprosy worldwide. In 1991, the World Health Assembly adopted the target of “elimination of leprosy as a public health problem by the year 2000” Elimination was defined as a reduction in the prevalence of patients with leprosy receiving antimicrobial therapy at a given time to less than 1 per 10,000 populations. This project had successfully cured 13 to 14 million people by MDT1, and full control of the disease (as assessed by prevalence rate) has been officially achieved in 112 of the 122 countries where leprosy was endemic in 1985.

image

The WHO then started a project2 “the final push to eliminate leprosy”. This final push for eliminating leprosy involves: Making leprosy diagnosis and treatment available, free of charge, at all health centers, particularly in endemic areas; enabling every health worker to diagnose and treat leprosy; dispelling the fear of leprosy, improving awareness of its early signs, and motivating people to seek treatment; ensuring all leprosy patients are cured. These projects successfully decrease leprosy cases in the world. During the past five years, the global number of new cases detected has continued to decrease dramatically, at an average rate of nearly 20% per year.

Through the international cooperation, WHO, World Bank, UNICEF and UNDP launched the TDR projects to eliminate leprosy. WHO also provided free MDT drugs to those endemic countries. In local levels, there are a lot of works needs to do.

National decentralized campaigns

Most of the cases now are in the rural or poor health infrastructures areas1, 3-5. Decreasing the cases in these areas needs to integrate the existing local health infrastructure, public health care workers. Sustaining political commitments are also important. Politicians need to enhance advocacy efforts to reduce the stigma and discrimination against persons and families affected by leprosy. Cases surveillance and registry systems also need to setup to evaluating and monitoring the efficiency of the projects.

Prevention

Although the efficiency of BCG to prevent tuberculosis is controversial, the efficiency of BCG to prevent leprosy has been proved 6. BCG gives variable protective efficacy against leprosy in different countries, ranging from 34% to 80%. Therefore, in leprosy endemic countries, BCG vaccination for children can decrease the incidence of leprosy.

Contacting leprosy patients is a risk factor for the disease, and chemoprophylaxis of close contacts of leprosy patients can be an effective control strategy. In countries with rare cases or chemoprophylaxis are not eligible, health care workers should educate clinical signs of leprosy and advise to report any new skin lesions and contact history to their physicians. Early diagnosis and treatment are the best policies to decrease the disability.

Decrease the Disability

Besides early diagnosis and treatment, adequately protecting damaged nerve and skin tissues are important as well. Educating cases cautiously care their skin. Just as the care of diabetic foots, cases should be taught to wear adequate shoes or gloves when they expose dangerous environment. Any new wounds which are located in denerved regions should adequately clean and care6, 7. For eyes, using tear substitute and antibiotics ointments to protect dry cornea, wearing glasses, and covering with pads are methods to prevent further disability.

Decrease Stigmas

Decreasing stigmas for leprosy is the most difficult mission. However, the best method to decreasing the stigma is curing leprosy. People isolated leprosy cases from the society because they worried about they were infected by leprosy cases. If leprosy can be cured, the stigma vanishes. Public health practitioners, health care workers, and school teachers should teach communities concepts of leprosy transmission, clinical signs and symptoms, and outcome of the treatment. The more people understand the disease, the fewer stigmas will have. Politicians and public figures also should tell the public correct concepts and attitudes for leprosy2, 5, 6; government should legislate to protect these cases’ human right; employers and schools need to accept cured cases to work and study. Only active attitude can decrease the stigma.

Conclusion

With the international cooperation, leprosy cases decreased dramatically. With continuing efforts and collaborative activities, leprosy will be soon eliminated.

 

Reference

1. Rinaldi A. The global campaign to eliminate leprosy. PLoS Med 2005;2:e341.

2. WHO. Guide to Eliminate Leprosy as a Public Health Problem

Geneva; 2007.

3. WHO regional strategy for sustaining leprosy services and further reducing the burden of leprosy, 2006-2010. Indian J Lepr 2006;78:33-47.

4. WHO global strategy for further reducing the leprosy burden and sustaining leprosy control activities (Plan period: 2006-2010). Indian J Lepr 2006;78:7-31.

5. WHO. WHO Global Strategy Report 2006-2010. Geneva; 2007.

6. Britton WJ, Lockwood DN. Leprosy. Lancet 2004;363:1209-19.

7. Walker SL, Lockwood DN. Leprosy. Clin Dermatol 2007;25:165-72.

繼續閱讀

2008年5月4日 星期日

老年人的血壓控制

 

        著名的醫學期刊New England Journal of Medicine(NEJM)最近刊了一篇文章: Treatment of Hypertension in Patients 80 Years of Age or Older(八十歲以上的老年人高血壓治療),這篇文章中,研究團隊使用利尿劑 Indapamide (Natrilix) 和血管緊張素轉化酶抑製劑 (ACEI)perindopril (單獨使用或混合使用)和對照組(僅使用安慰劑)相比較,試驗的族群是80歲以上的老年人,持續血壓超過160 毫米汞柱,治療血壓目標是150/80毫米汞柱,追蹤時間大概兩年觀察實驗族群的血壓變化和是否有致命性的中風。

       臨床實驗結果顯示:治療組與對照組降血壓的比例分別為15和6毫米汞柱,治療組降低了39%的中風死亡率、21%的其他死亡率、23%的心血管疾病死亡率、和64%的心衰竭。

         這個臨床實驗看來好像沒什麼特別,降低血壓當然會將低相關的疾病危險性,為了找尋和老年相關的高血壓治療資料,首先先上實證醫學 的重鎮Cochrane Review 上面去找,結果找到了一篇Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in the elderly,是1997年做的整理,這篇文章的重點主要針對超過60歲以上的高血壓族群,從大量的醫學研究中作出整理,總共找了15個隨機對照(Randomized Controlled Trial)的臨床試驗、收集了21,908個病人做分析,分析指出乙型阻斷劑(beta blocker)和利尿劑(diuretics)有降血壓的效果,心血管疾病的併發症和死亡率、死亡率都有降低,沒有明顯的副作用被報告,不過這篇文章因為是很早期,當時藥物的選擇種類不多,經過了十年之後,現在對於降血壓藥物的選擇變多了,那我們可以用的選擇呢?

       Google果然告訴我們有人已經幫我們做了整理,一共有2篇比較重要的文章,第一篇是我們的鄰國日本作的:Guidelines for Treatment of Hypertension in the Elderly 、接著有Treatment guideline in the USA: hypertension in the elderly,美國的治療指引比較舊一點(1998),不過裡面提到可以使用的藥物就很多了,包括甲型阻斷劑(Alpha blocker)、乙型阻斷劑(beta blocker)、鈣離子阻斷劑(calcium channel blocker)、血管緊張素轉化酶抑製劑、利尿劑(diuretics)等等,依照病人不同的需要給予不同的治療。

      這篇日本的整理文章實在非常詳細,原文一共有38頁,包含高血壓的詳細介紹:什麼狀況下要懷疑有高血壓,有哪些特別的疾病會和高血壓有關(如腎性高血壓),高血壓的併發症(心臟、腦部、腎臟、血管)等等,對於年紀大的高血壓治療,血壓的標準也比較高一點,在文中表八提到:

Age (yr) 60–69 70–79 80 and older
Systolic BP (mmHg) <140 <150 <160
Diastolic BP (mmHg) <90 <90 <90
       

其中還包括生活型態的調整: 飲食、運動、減重、戒菸等等,在藥物的選擇上面,就更多元了,各式各樣的藥物都可以使用,在文中的圖一和表九都有詳細敘述

image

 

image

 

      在老年人用藥需要特別注意的交互作用方面,高血壓藥物和其他藥物的交互作用,也有在文中有詳細敘述,最後,作者還提到要怎麼衡量老年高血壓病人的生活品質,要怎麼針對老年人的生活品質的需求選擇適當的藥物,是一個十分詳細針對老年人高血壓治療的詳細指引。

     雖然高血壓是一個在老年族群行率高的疾病,但是卻很少有專文專門針對老年人的疾病介紹、治療、和藥物選擇,從這幾篇重要的研究和整理中,可以了解到好好控制老年人的血壓可以降低很多併發症,但是在控制的過程中,也要注意一些老人家特有的狀況,才是對老人家最好的照顧。

   

 

延伸閱讀

1. Treatment of Hypertension in Patients 80 Years of Age or Older (NEJM)

2. Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in the elderly (Cochrane Review)

3. Guidelines for Treatment of Hypertension in the Elderly (Japan review, 2002) 必看!!!!

4. Treatment guideline in the USA: hypertension in the elderly (1998)

 

收進你的MyShare個人書籤

繼續閱讀

2008年5月1日 星期四

Screening for MRSA

 

        很久沒有寫和ID有關的文章了,不過今天看到BMJ本周的社論: Screening for MRSA,覺得這是一篇很棒的文章,一定要和大家好好分享,看看公共衛生的始祖--英國,怎麼來探討這個問題。

                 首先,為什麼會有這篇文章,當然是MRSA的問題愈來愈嚴重,為了讓非醫學專業領域的人也了解這個公共衛生問題的嚴重性,先簡單介紹一下MRSA的背景:

      從Wikipedia 開始,Wikipedia 華語板是這樣介紹MRSA的:

      抗藥性金黃色葡萄球菌(Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus或Multiple-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,簡稱MRSA)是 金黃色葡萄球菌的一個獨特菌株,能抵抗所有青黴素,包括甲氧西林及其他抗β內醘胺酶的青黴素 MRSA首次發現於1961年的英國,現時已廣泛散播,在醫院中牠更被稱為「超級細菌」。

     雖然MRSA傳統上被視為是從醫院感染(Hospital-associated MRSA,簡稱HA-MRSA),但現時在美國已有一種社區型的MRSA(Community-associated MRSA,簡稱CA-MRSA)

      葡萄球菌是一種在環境中極之普遍存在的細菌,相信全世界人口有約三分之一的體內帶有牠,而在一般的健康情況下並不會造成任何問題。過去,葡萄球菌只會在弄傷皮膚或傷口處造成感染。但最近卻由於過度使用抗生素的緣故,金黃色葡萄球菌的菌株已形成抗藥性。若免疫系統出現弱點時,縱然沒有傷口亦可以導致抗藥性金黃色葡萄球菌感染。徵狀會是癤,甚至於壞死性筋膜炎。MRSA感染一般會使用萬古黴素來治療,但現時亦已發現了具有抗萬古黴素的葡萄球菌。

 

      MRSA的感染個案往往是起源於醫院或是體育館。很多專業運動員在體育館的更衣室內感染了MRSA。另外,於2006年6月22日,因54人在無執照紋身館感染MRSA,美國疾病控制與預防中心發出了因紋身爆發的MRSA感染警告。

       總之就是一種因為抗生素發明之後產生抗藥性的細菌,對人類的健康有很大的影響,MRSA被認為最大的問題是會增加住院病人的死亡率,依此做好控管就成為醫院的燙手山芋。

       BMJ這篇文章主要是要為本期的一篇投稿--

Impact of rapid screening tests on acquisition of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: cluster randomised crossover trial 作導讀,編輯(Mark H Wilcox, professor of medical microbiology)很認真的找了很多相關的資料,來探討這個相關的議題。

        文章一開始就指出住院病人全面去篩檢MRSA的效果是有爭議的,最主要的原因是有研究認為篩檢可以降低院內群突發的暴發,但是這些研究是沒有對照組的,師檢所帶來的好處當然和包括檢查本身的敏感性、分離病菌的能力、和醫院本身處理的能力(一些感管措施如洗手、隔離等等)有關,這裡作者舉了一個在英國所做的研究來做說明。

      以荷蘭來說,MRSA Screening降低了MRSA的移生和感染的比率,但是在英國,MRSA的流行讓隔離病房的需求供不應求,這使得MRSA和其他抗藥性菌株的控制難上加難。

      一般來說,過去對於MRSA的移生都會採取使用Mupirocin的方式去降低,但是這個措施會產生細菌對Mupirocin的抗藥性,最近的研究也指出用任何方法去減少這樣的移生的方法是效果不彰的,短期使用可能會改善或降低遺生的狀況,但不是一個長期解決的方法。

    對於住院病人MRSA的篩檢,英國的指引建議MRSA的篩檢應該放在高危險族群(轉院或在入院的病人、曾住過加護病房,動過心臟胸腔手術、骨科、和重大創傷的病人)身上,但是這些族群隨醫院的特性也不同,這使得這樣的篩檢無法標準化施行。

     接下來是實施的點,入院時篩檢還是出院時篩檢呢? 出院時篩檢可以知道MRSA移生的狀況,是並沒有辦法改善感染,已經知道病人有MRSA並不能延長病人出院的時間也不能解決這些病人被慢性照護機構所排除的狀況,況且將這些病『標籤化』還會造成病人的不安和法律的問題。在缺乏強烈的證據支持要全面篩檢的狀況下,英國衛生部還是要求所有的一般住院病人在2009年五月前要有MRSA的篩檢,緊急入院的病人則要盡快實施。

     我對這個很有興趣,就跑去查了到底英國衛生部是怎麼規定的:

    根據英國衛生部在2008年1月發布的The Health Act 2006: Code of practice for the prevention and control of healthcare associated infections(這裡面包含的真是包羅萬象,值得大家去看),裡面的第16頁

l. Control of infections of specific alert organisms
MRSA
The policy should make provision for:
• admission screening, which should include screening of all elective admissions by March
2009 and provision for screening of emergency admissions at presentation as soon
as is practical;
• decontamination procedures for colonised patients;
• isolation of infected or colonised patients;
• transfer of infected or colonised patients within NHS bodies or to other
healthcare facilities; and
• antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery.

     檢驗的方式有兩種,快速檢驗法(一般大概2-4小時)和傳統的培養法(一般需要至少24 小時),一般來說,如果不能及時的知道MRSA的結果,可能會增加病菌傳播的機率,也有一些研究去研究快速檢驗法的時效性,在本期的BMJ中,Jeyaratnam團隊用的方法顯示快速檢驗的方法和傳統的檢驗方法一樣並不能改善MRSA的傳播狀況,不適當的管控措施會降低快速檢驗的效率,而快速檢驗法本身的花費也較高。

     Jeyaratnam團隊的研究仍然很有可讀性,他在控制Confounder(其他管控MRSA的方式和抗生素的使用)的方式很成功(這部分很值得讀),及時的知道結果可以降低不適當的隔離(英國的隔離政策),他的研究主要以老年病房、腫瘤病房、和一般外科病房為主,但是研究中卻缺乏一些特殊單位(加護病房)的狀況,這些單位是MRSA問題最嚴重的地方,這些瑕疵使得他的研究打了折扣。

        作者又舉了一個瑞士的研究指出,當MRSA的感染比率不高的時候,MRSA的盛行率也不高,MRSA的傳播狀況也不是很嚴重,但是如果MRSA的比率升高,即使病人入院的篩檢是陰性的,感管措施也算適當,快速檢驗的時間只需要22小時就知道結果,病人仍然會有機會感染MRSA。

       最後作者認為適當嚴格執行的感管措施還是降低MRSA感染的最佳方式,由英國The Health Protection Agency (HPA) 所公布的資料顯示,最近在英國的MRSA血流感染有降低的趨勢:

MRSA bloodstream infection figures – a summary of cases reported under mandatory surveillance in England

Quarter Number of MRSA bacteraemia reports
April 2006 – June 2006 1742
July 2006 – September 2006 1651
October 2006 – December 2006 1543
January 2007 – March 2007 1447
April 2007 – June 2007 1304
July – September 2007 1072

資料來源:

Quarterly Reporting Results for Clostridium difficile Infections and MRSA Bacteraemia. April 2008

      至於英國用什麼方法降低MRSA的血流感染呢,在Jeyaratnam的文章裡面有提到:洗手、戴手套、拋棄式隔離袍、小心拋棄所有可能汙染的物品、隔離MRSA的病人,隔離措施必須把病人置於病房的一角或是指定區域,篩檢出MRSA的病人必須開始採用去移生的方式,這些方式包括使用chlorhexidine的清潔劑,如果是對mupirocin 有敏感性的,使用mupirocin藥膏,已經發生移生的傷口用povidone iodine 或是silver sulphadiazine 的方式處理,篩檢出MRSA陽性的病人必須每周再篩檢一次,直到連續三次陰性為止,如果選擇性入院手術病人在入院前已知MRSA篩檢為陽性的,延後住院到轉變為陰性(經過治療或其他方式)為止,如果病人從高風險的地方入院(安養中心、過去曾經是MRSA帶菌者、轉院、或其他醫院的高風險區域)則採取隔離及完全照護的原則,直到結果是陰性為止。

     從BBC ABC Times的報導指出英國衛生部從2007年9月開始全面禁止醫師戴項鍊、戒指、領帶、禁止穿長袖衣物和白袍,同時醫院也採取更嚴格的管制措施以降低MRSA和Clostridium difficile的政策,看來效果果然卓著,當然禁止醫師穿白袍不是唯一的方法,但是似乎是個不錯的政策選擇之一,要禁止所謂的『菁英族群』放棄職業象徵的意義其實並不簡單,從BMJ上有很多人投稿討論這個問題就知道這不是一個很容易實施的政策,但從公共衛生層面的角度看來,公共衛生的始祖國家--英國政府對於抗藥性問題採取的方式卻十分積極,不是只消息宣導和收集資料分析的資料,更主動出擊,要求醫院要確實遵守相關的規定。的確,要降低Superbug的方式絕對不是只有單靠醫院政策就可以辦得到的,可能還需要有政府和政策面強力的介入才行。

 

延伸閱讀

1. Screening for MRSA- BMJ (ID 必看)

2. Impact of rapid screening tests on acquisition of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: cluster randomised crossover trial (ID必看,他的研究方法很不錯)

3. MRSA in Healthcare Settings-CDC 

4. British Guidelines for the control and prevention of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in healthcare facilities

 

收進你的MyShare個人書籤

繼續閱讀

2008年4月30日 星期三

世界衛生日:  維護人類健康適應環境變化

 

World Health Day 2008: protecting health from climate change

 

 

世界衛生日是我永遠不會忘記的日子,因為我就是世界衛生日出生的,或許這就註定了要走公共衛生這條
路,畢竟人算不如天算,還是乖乖的順天應人,好好的走這條路吧。

世界衛生日,當然不只是個紀念日而已,而是這個日子的意義。
看看Google 怎麼給定義吧:

中央廣播電台的新聞辭典:

4月7日是世界衛生日(World Health Day; WHD )。每年的這一天,世界各地的都要舉行各種紀念活動,來強調健康對於勞動創造和幸福生活的重要性。
1946年7月22日,61個國家簽署的世界衛生組織(World Health Organization;WHO)組織法正式被批准,在1948年6月至7月舉行的第一屆世界衛生大會,決定把每年的7月22日定為「世界衛生日」(World Health Day, WHD ),提倡各國在這一天舉行各種紀念活動。
到了第二屆世界衛生大會,因為考慮到7月22日大部分的國家教育機構和學校,都剛好放暑假,無法參與慶祝活動,決定從1950年起,把世界衛生日改為4月7日。

每年在世界衛生日這天,將會針對一項特定的世界性健康議題,藉由全球性的同步推廣,來提昇全世界對某一個衛生領域的認識,透過舉辦主題活動來進行全球性的宣導與呼籲,以喚起全世界對此議題的認識,進一步成為該領域工作推廣的重要推手。

image

WHO/Benoist Matsha-Carpentier

Displaced people from Sudan's Darfur collect water in the Gassire camp in Eastern Chad. Lower precipitation due to climate change causes water scarcity and reduced food production, increasing the risk of displacement and conflict, as in Darfur.

 

 

那今年的世界衛生日,有什麼特殊的議題呢?

世界衛生組織(WHO)是這樣說的:

     科學家已經證實全球暖化是一個明白的事實,增加地球的溫度造成冰山融化、海平面上升都是我們面臨的新挑戰,除了這些環境挑戰之外,伴隨氣候變化而來的人類健康問題也是另一個重要的衝擊,因此WHO要讓大家了解這個衝擊,今年特別選擇這樣的主題來提醒人類所面臨的新健康挑戰。

      環境變化已經危害到人類健康,更多的風暴、水災、乾旱、及熱浪都衝擊著人類健康的基本要素:空氣、水、食物、住所及免於疾病的狀況。

     目前全球所面臨重要因為氣候影響所帶來的疾病已經造成百萬人喪生,這些疾病包括營養不良(造成每年350萬人喪生),腹瀉(造成每年180萬人死亡),瘧疾(造成每年100萬人死亡)。除了這些之外,許多天災所造成的災害也危害的人類的健康,這些都提供了我們思考未來的參考:

1. 2003年歐洲熱浪襲擊,估計造成了無預期的7萬多人死亡。

2. 非洲的裂谷熱爆發被認為和暴雨有關,在氣候改變之後發生的頻率也跟著升高。

3. 2005年Katrina颶風造成1800人死亡和數以千計的人無家可歸,當地的醫療設施也深受其害。

4. 孟加拉的霍亂大流行被認為和水災和不安全的飲用水有關。

這些都是過去碰到和氣候變化有關的重要事件,未來氣候的變化將更艱難,我們所面臨的挑戰將更危險峻,尤其是開發中國家,這些狀況將更難控制。為了減少這些傷害,WHO將主導和支持各種研究以保護人類健康免於氣候改變的危害,尤其是協助開發中國家保護最弱勢的婦女及兒童,WHO將和其他聯合國的組織一起合作建立更好的監視及預測系統和更完善的基礎設施以減少氣候變化對人類健康的危害性。

 

延伸閱讀

 

WHO web site: World Health Day

NEWS

News release
Climate change will erode foundations of health

Statements & messages
Statement from Director-General Dr Margaret Chan

Message from UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon

FEATURES

Fact file
10 facts on climate change and health

Video clips
Message from Director-General [wmv duration 00:03:39]
Message from Director-General (transcript)

Podcast
Episode 31: World Health Day 2008 - duration 00:07:58 [mp3 4.5Mb]




RESOURCES
Download: public service announcement - video (6 languages)
Issues paper - full [pdf 2.05Mb]
Issues paper - summary [pdf 31kb]
Posters (high-resolution) [pdf 7.17Mb]
Posters (low-resolution) [pdf 1.33Mb]
Photos to download

BACKGROUND
About this year's theme
Aims and objectives of World Health Day 2008
Goals for World Health Day 2008
Key messages

繼續閱讀

Earth Day! 『餓死』日 ?

            4/22日是所謂的Earth Day,在這天全世界的各界人士都會用各種方法來表現出對『蓋亞』母親的關懷,
今年的地球日,除了照例有各式各樣的訴求和活動表現出減碳、重視環境,減緩全球暖化的議題之外,
卻有另外一種不一樣的聲音,讓這一天,不只是關懷地球,更關懷生活在地球上的人們。

           聯合國糧食總署、世界銀行等許多跨國組織紛紛表示,人類面臨糧食危機的重大挑戰,全球各地都發生糧食短缺的問題,有些國家(海地)甚至發生暴亂,各種糧食價格都不斷上漲,以稻米來說,價格已經上漲至2004年以來的最高價,漲幅甚至高達50%,亞洲各主要稻米輸出國(第一大國泰國及第二大國越南),紛紛開始討論是否要減少外銷比例,以內銷自用為主。當然糧食上漲的原因可能是人口的增加、天災的發生造成供需失調,但是以目前全球都缺的狀況來說,不再是只是人口增加和產量不足而已,還包含了許多複雜的因素。

image 圖片來源:

Economist

糧食當然是供需要平衡,世界人口的成長當然是糧食供需失調的一個很重要因素,但是除了人口成長之外,地球的氣候環境改變也成了一個重要因素,非洲大陸、澳洲、亞洲地區紛紛發生旱災,這些旱災的發生,是否和全球暖化有關,有待科學家們進一步的研究,不過的確有些地方出現了多年未見的旱災,以澳洲來說,由於乾旱的關係,農民不得不放棄需水量大的稻米,改種葡萄等較可耐旱的植物,這種轉變,當然減少了全球稻米的供應。

點選圖片可另開新視窗

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

image

點選圖片可另開新視窗,圖片來源:New York Times

            當然除了天災之外,還有其他因素都影響到糧食的上漲,其中一個很值得注意的因素就是肥料的增加使用,為因應糧食的需求,農民使用肥料增加產量,可是全球肥料的需求量的上升,也帶動的肥料價格的上升,觀察過去十年可以發現,全球各地對於肥料的需求量都在上升,這些肥料需求的上升,也帶來了新的問題,在土壤中的肥料,經過雨水沖刷或其他因素流到河流及海洋,造成沿海地區藻類的快速繁殖,這些藻類的繁殖,造成耗氧量的增加,使得全球各地沿岸的Dead Zone 增加,造成重大生態環境的改變。

           另外一個重要的因素就是Biofuel的使用,為了減少對石炭原料的依賴,人類想出了使用植物來做為碳的來源,許多植物如玉米、大豆、棕櫚油、甘蔗酒精都可轉換為生質柴油,作為油品的替代能源,對於生物能源的大量需求,也同時影響了實務作物的空間,為了獲取更高的利潤,許多國家放棄了將這些糧食作物,轉變為能源作物,而先進國家對於能源的大量需求,減少了糧食的供應,更帶動了糧食的上漲,難怪祕魯和波利維亞總統要質疑和反對先進國家的生物能源政策,認為這些政策加重了窮困國家的糧食問題。巴西總統曾經說過,生物能源的使用,不能加重糧食的問題,還是要以糧食問題作為首要考慮,要開發非糧食的替代能源。

         此外全球化也是一個重要的因素,為了要讓商品可以全球流通,降低價格,很多食物透過各種交通工具的運輸,到達全世界,在挪威捕到的鱈魚,送到中國的工廠加工之後再送回挪威,加州的有機蔬菜,透過飛機和車輛運輸送到紐約,這些浪費掉的能源,都沒有考慮在內,是否需要這樣大費周章的去運送食物,當地或附近產地難道沒有適當的食物嗎? 當然,這樣的食物運輸促進了許多產業和跨國貿易的發展,可是同時也製造了新的問題,在能源缺乏的時代,為了食物,要用更多的食物作物去換取能源和減少價錢嗎?

         看來,地球的問題並不小,Earth Day也不只是談談保護環境那樣簡單,減碳的政策牽動全世界,有人要使用食物來當能源的時候,卻也有人無法吃飽,民以食為天,吃飽是人類的最安全基本需求,希望下一個Earth Day,不是『餓死』日。

 

 

 

延伸閱讀

1. Empty bowls, stomachs and pockets

2. Shortages Threaten Farmers’ Key Tool: Fertilizer

3. A New, Global Oil Quandary: Costly Fuel Means Costly Calories

4. A Drought in Australia, a Global Shortage of Rice

5. Environmental Cost of Shipping Groceries Around the World

繼續閱讀